jump to navigation

System of belief vs. redemptive life July 26, 2007

Posted by Alien Drums in Bible, Christianity, Emerging church, Postmodern, Scripture, Theology.
7 comments

I sent this quote to a family member recently:

Brian McLaren:
“When Christian faith presents itself as a system of belief, postmodern people are often skeptical. But when it presents itself as a redemptive way of life within human history, they see something unique and hopeful.”

He responded with the following:

“Our Christian faith is both a system of beliefs and a way of life. My question for Maclaren is this: Is it not our beliefs that determine how we live and think and act? Postmodern people, including myself at times, tend to believe in all sorts of things that are contrary to the word of God. And at the same time they (we) try to live a “redemptive life” that will hopefully, in the end, outweigh a life of unbelief. Redemptive living cannot be a substitue for a right believing in, and knowing of, God.

“Redemptive living is a necessary result of walking and talking and trusting Jesus and His word.”

And here’s my response:

I think the problem is not “belief,” it’s “system.” Modern, rationalistic man has done something that Christ, a premodern, did not seek to do; modern man sought to systematize belief, to construct a logical system of A+B=C. This systematizing effort actually began much before modernity but Jesus did not do it. He almost completely used story (his own and the one’s he told). Story is a great way to convey truth but it is not a systematized way of conveying truth. When you start to try to organize and systematize you almost invariably change it because you are trying to connect dots that previously were not connected. Not systemization can be helpful because it helps us organize our thinking, but we need to recognize that the act of putting it into a system changes the message.

Regarding your question: “Is it not our beliefs that determine how we live and think and act?” Here’s how I would approach it: Some would say how you live and think and act actually reflect what you believe. That is true in a sense, but I’m reminded of Paul in Romans saying that he did what he did not want to do and didn’t do the things he wanted to. I believe the Fall has produced an inconsistency within men and women that distorts the easy connection between beliefs and actions. Most believers would affirm that believers do in fact still sin. In other words, even though they believe it’s wrong to sin, they (we) still sin. If their actions reflect what they truly believe, then they’re not a Christian because they did not trust Christ in that circumstance. As a result, you cannot be absolute about that. I think you can say that the difference between your beliefs and your actions create a discontinuity in life that causes great spiritual and mental discomfort. Which reminds me of the old quote about not resting until we rest in Thee.

You said postmodern people tend to believe in all sorts of things that are contrary to the Word of God. Of course, that is not isolated to postmodern people; modernists are just as contrary. But the difficulty is the “contrary to the Word of God” part. That is stated as if it is an established fact. The reality is not so simple. Many believing modernists and postmodernists disagree on what the Word of God teaches. For instance, people used to use that very phrase to justify slavery and then racial discrimination. Now, we think that is ridiculous, but those Christians who once believed that thought Scripture was clear in that regard. It’s because they looked at Scripture through a cultural window and found what they wanted to find. That tendency has been there throughout the history of the church, and so I suspect that you and I are susceptible to that same tendency. What seems obvious to us is not so obvious to people of other times, places or cultural perspectives.

Now, we can take Jesus’ words to the bank: “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten son. …” But we still have to interpret what that means to us today. That may seem easy, but it’s not. The first step is trying to understand what the original Greek words that were written down mean because, as you know, every translation is an interpretation. (Plus there’s another translation that has taken place — Aramaic to Greek — that scholars can only speculate about.) To understand the words requires comparisons to other texts, biblical and non-bibilical, that use the words. Once you have a pretty good grasp of what the words and phrases and sentences mean, then you start having to compare them with the other words of Christ to see how they might work together; then you compare them with other scriptural teachings on the same topic and again try to understand how they relate. Of course, there are seeming contradictions. Well, in fact, there are some genuine contradictions but they are not that critical. In trying to deal with the seeming contradictions you must employ another level of interpretation. And then you look at what other Christians have said through history and how they have interpreted those passages. More interpretation.

So, while it’s easy to say “contrary to the Word of God,” that’s a really fuzzy statement; and well-meaning, “orthodox,” believing experts and spiritual giants through the years have interpreted Scripture differently. While I might say that some things McLaren and other postmodernists might believe appear to be contrary to Scripture, I could say the same thing about any Christian thinker. I am using my interpretation of Scripture to say that.

Of course, this doesn’t even begin to deal with one’s basic approach to Scripture. Everything I just said can be said about people who approach Scripture as God’s unique, authoritative, even inerrant Word of God. If you don’t say any or all of those things then you open yourself to even more possible interpretations.

I don’t think McLaren is saying that redemptive living is a substitute for belief; he’s saying that redemptive living is what attracts others to our Savior. If faith in Christ has changed us, redeemed our lives, then others have hope that it can redeem their lives, as well. As in the early church, what really attracted people to Christ was the fact that believers loved one another and that it showed itself in outward ways.

Short question, long response. Great to hear from you. I pray for you every day because, like Christ, I love you. Blessings.

Generous orthodoxy April 10, 2007

Posted by Alien Drums in Emerging church.
1 comment so far

I finally took Glenn Hager’s advice and listened to an abridged version of Brian McLaren’s A Generous Orthodoxy. Excellent. Like Glenn says, this book pretty much reflects my own thinking, at least the abridged version. I’ll now have to read the whole thing.

The challenge of studying Jesus April 7, 2007

Posted by Alien Drums in Bible, Christianity, Church, Emerging church, Jesus, Scripture, Truth.
1 comment so far

Since our understanding of the time of Jesus is growing, then we need to keep an open mind in our interpreting of Scripture. Some of our long-held assumptions may be incorrect. Some things we have thought of as literal may need to be seen as metaphorical.

That’s my paraphrase of a section from the first chapter of N.T. Wright’s The Challenge of Jesus (p. 17). He, of course, would not want to take credit for those exact words and might even question the accuracy of them; but it’s what I think he’s saying. The first chapter is titled “The Challenge of Studying Jesus.” I would like to unpack its meaning a little.

Another paraphrase:

Post-Reformation theology created a new set of dogmas that have been sustained as institutionalized beliefs, and these have created people with interests at stake in maintaining these dogmas. (p. 20)

I’m involved in this exercise of paraphrasing because I believe Wright has a great deal to say to believers today. I put parts of his book into my words in order to try to better internalize it.

Paraphrase again:

When the church stops trying to understand, it begins to slip into idolatry and idealogy. (p. 21)

Why does the church stop trying to understand? Fear, I think; at least that has impacted me. I have, at times, been afraid that my faith would be shaken, that the theological ground would fall out from under me if I explored too much outside the safe havens of my faith group. By the grace of God, I have been able to overcome those fears and explore. My fears have never been realized. Whenever I read outside of my own Christian tradition or outside of Christianity, I find my faith strengthened. Of course, the content of my faith or my theology has changed, but I feel more firmly rooted in the truth. Despite this experience of growth, there is still fear at times.

Another paraphrase:

The Enlightenment created a divide between faith and reason. This is an unnatural divide but it has shaped much of the discussion for 200 years. (p. 21)

I have been aware of this divide but have always thought it unhelpful, probably because I have been a person who valued both faith and reason and the interplay of the two. Apparently, I should be thankful, and I am.

Three more paraphrases:

There are many misunderstandings of Scripture that have been enshrined as church tradition. (p. 27)

And he’s not just talking about Catholic Church traditions. We Protestants have ours, as well.

It takes courage to read the Bible in new ways. (p. 28)

The community of Christ is called to tell the story of Jesus and model it. (p. 32)

Now a quote:

“Do not be afraid of the Quest. It may be part of the means whereby the church in our own day will be granted a new vision, not just of Jesus, but of God.” (p. 32)

Driving in the fog February 22, 2007

Posted by Alien Drums in Christianity, Emerging church, Faith, Postmodern, Religion.
Tags: ,
5 comments

Driving in the fog is dangerous. Living in a fog can be dangerous, too. But is it all that bad?

Yesterday, the fog was pretty heavy when I started for work. It was not terrible fog, but it was not drive-as-fast-as-normal fog either.

I took my time. I focused. No radio. No distractions. Concentrating in the moment. There’s something a bit intense about driving in the fog. You don’t get sleepy. You’re alert.

So what about living in a fog? I’m not talking about a mental fog; I’m talking about moving forward without being able to see clearly what is ahead of you. It’s a pretty good way to live. You take your time. You focus. You live in the moment.

We seem to be a culture caught up in planning, and the ultimate expression of planning the “road” ahead is this corporate nonsense about developing mission and vision statements and all such consultant-contrived devices. I say corporate nonsense because that’s where it had its genesis, but it has taken over churches and religious institutions and even individual lives.

In churches and institutions, my experience has shown that more energy is put into “strategic” statements than in actually getting anything done. We’ve swallowed the planning Kool-aid; and when you swallow the Kool-aid, you end up buying the farm. (Check Jonestown reference to Kool-aid somewhere.)

Astrophysicist Alar Toomre may have a helpful word for us. He tries to make headway in his research by focusing on the little issues, not the big ones.

Denise Shekerjian, in her book Uncommon Genius, paraphrases Toomre’s approach this way: “What is important is to focus your interests on one or two discrete, localized, particularized questions pulled out from a universe of one’s interests. Work on the small matters utterly, he explains, and the large necessities can be left to take care of themselves and of those who trusted accordingly.” (p. 10)

That sounds like good old fashion work. Maybe we need a little more work and a little less strategic planning in our individual lives, our church lives and our institutional lives. Because, it sure seems to me, that we’re not getting much done.

Let’s drive in the fog a little and live in the moment.

Putting out the light February 12, 2007

Posted by Alien Drums in Christianity, Emerging church, Religion, Spirituality, Theology, Truth.
add a comment

“John Cotton provoked bitterness, for he saw the light, considered the effect, and then deliberately helped to put it out.” (Edith Curtis, quoted in Eve LaPlante’s American Jezebel, p. 138)

Curtis is talking about John Cotton’s failure in 1637 Massachusetts Bay Colony. The minister’s theology had given rise to the unorthodox ministry of Anne Hutchinson, yet as the political and ecclesiastical power built against her, Cotton backed away. He compromised in order to keep his pulpit, while Hutchinson stuck to her theological guns and was banished from the colony.

I don’t particularly like the theology of either Cotton or Hutchinson, but I have more respect for Hutchinson because she remained true to her beliefs despite the consequences. More importantly for me personally, I don’t want to be another John Cotton. I don’t want to compromise just to keep a job. More importantly still, I don’t want to compromise and thus put out a light that might burn brightly otherwise.

I do this blog anonymously because I work for a Christian organization, and this is my means of exploring ideas without fear of retribution. I pray that if I become convinced of light that is contrary to the accepted beliefs of the organization that pays my salary that I will have the courage to stand in the light. I doubt I am alone in facing this challenge.

Forward momentum February 11, 2007

Posted by Alien Drums in Baptists, Christianity, Emerging church, Religion, Spirituality, Theology, Truth.
1 comment so far

“What if faith were more like the earth than a building? What if faith could never be stable in the way God intends it to be if it didn’t have forward momentum and if that momentum weren’t in the field of the gravity of God himself? And if you don’t like that metaphor, think of a bird in flight or a bicycle or a ship on the sea. In each case, there’s movement in relation to some larger forces and realities. Stability comes through an interplay of those factors.” (Neo says in Brian McLaren’s A New Kind of Christian, p. 55)

So how do we maintain forward momentum in our spiritual life?

For me, reading outside my religious and theological tradition has been helpful. More than that, it has been reinvigorating.

I have been a Baptist almost all of my life, but I did some doctoral work at a Presbyterian seminary. I loved it. I didn’t agree with the professors on some key issues, but I loved hearing things from a different perspective.

My favorite author, C.S. Lewis, was an Anglican. I don’t think any of my favorite authors are Baptists.

The blog world just compounds this, and I love it.

I open to suggestions for keeping forward spiritual momentum.

A web of faith February 9, 2007

Posted by Alien Drums in Christianity, Emerging church, Religion, Spirituality, Truth.
5 comments

“What if faith isn’t best compared to a building, but rather to a spiderweb? Instead of one foundation, it has several anchor points. Those points might be spiritual experiences, exemplary people and institutions whom one has come to trust, that sort of thing,” Neo says in Brian McLaren’s A New Kind of Christian. (p. 54)

Spiritual experiences:

— Sitting alone in the hills of central Texas watching the proverbial babbling brook work its way downward while I read from The Cloud of Unknowing.

— Reading Perelandra by C.S. Lewis (my first Lewis read) and feeling like a whole knew world of understanding had just opened to me.

Exemplary people:

— My parents. Mom made me feel special by loving me as much as any son ever has been loved. Dad showed me how to make good decisions and take care of my family.

— Tom Landry and Roger Staubach. My heroes growing up. Good and godly men, who never gave up and often won while keeping the most important things — God and family — uppermost in their lives.

Institutions:

— Several churches where I came to love some wonderful people and had a chance to serve.

I love the web that my spiritual life has grown within. And those were only a few of the anchor points.

I would love to read some of yours.

Beyond the answer book February 7, 2007

Posted by Alien Drums in Bible, Christianity, Community, Emerging church, Religion, Scripture.
4 comments

“… [W]hen you let go of the Bible as God’s answer book, you get it back as something so much better,” Neo says in Brian McLaren’s A New Kind of Christian. (p. 52)

I suspect this may be the biggest key to evangelical Christians becoming the type of people God created us to be. I will speak for myself. It is hard to jettison the answer book habit.

More McLaren: “When we let it go as a modern answer book, we get to rediscover it for what it really is: an ancient book of incredible spiritual value for us. …” (p. 52) And more, “It’s a book that calls together and helps create a community, a community that is a catalyst for God’s work in the world.” (p. 53)

The difficult thing is that to move beyond the Bible as answer book means that some people in the Answer Book Community will banish you. I think that’s why the broad Missional Community that is developing is so important. I can say that because I’m just now discovering it. Prior to reading on this topic and blogging, I thought I was alone. Boy, was I wrong.

Spiritual tires February 2, 2007

Posted by Alien Drums in Christianity, Emerging church, Spirituality.
4 comments

This morning while driving to work in the dark, I struck a large piece of tire rubber that obviously had been shed by an 18-wheeler. My tires went over part of it, and the road clutter slapped the side of my car as I cruised along at 69 miles per hour. Then I hit another, smaller piece.

My car seemed unaffected by the encounter, but then I began to smell burning rubber. That didn’t make sense. Still I didn’t feel any problem through my steering wheel.

Half a minute later I come up close behind an 18-wheeler and I see sparks coming from under the right rear trailer wheel. Suddenly it’s obvious to me. I smelled the burning rubber because this truck had just thrown the tire.

I changed lanes to my left, flashed my bright lights, then drove up beside the cab, turned on my dome light and pointed back to the rear of the trailer. I couldn’t see the driver because I was down low in my Camry, but I figured he could see my signal in the light. I pulled in front; and, sure enough, he was slowing down to find out what was wrong.

I thought about stopping to help, but I figured he was probably better at that sort of thing than me anyway. It did, however, feel good to be of a little help. I didn’t do much of anything, but maybe it helped save his rim.

So what’s the big deal? Here’s the thought: A lot of people, including me, throw a spiritual tire at times and don’t even realize it. They lose something they had, but they’re moving so fast with life that they don’t notice. If they, if we, keep going like that, things will do nothing but get worse. What we need is someone to come alongside, get our attention and help us see the problem so we can “pull over” and get the problem fixed.

Sometimes, of course, we don’t need to point out the problem; we just need to help. Just like driving a truck on 18 wheels is better than on 17, driving a life with a connection to God is better than doing without. Of course, we must be careful not to try to drive other lives ourselves, just help them know Who can.

I hope this day you have some time to “pull over” and check your spiritual tires. I plan to do that, because I feel a little flat.

A little jarring. Is it true? January 30, 2007

Posted by Alien Drums in Bible, Christianity, Emerging church, Holy Spirit, Religion, Salvation, Scripture, Spirituality, Theology.
2 comments

“There is need of greater light than the word [Bible] of itself is able to give; for it is not all the promises in Scripture that have … wrought any gracious changes in my soul.” — John Cotton, 17th century

Cotton, a Puritan who was a pastor in early Boston, was emphasizing the work of the Holy Spirit in salvation and sanctification.

The Bible, we often say, has an amazing power to speak to our lives today. I think John Cotton would say that the Holy Spirit has an amazing power to speak to our lives today and that the Spirit often uses Scripture. I think this is correct. And by attributing the real power to the Spirit, we are really attributing it to God.

I think it also is true that we are in need of greater light than the word alone can give. God’s Word is greater than the words on the pages of the book we call the Bible. We all may know that, but we don’t act like it.

Cotton’s theology differed from most of the other ministers in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. It was more centered on the work of the Spirit and on grace, as opposed to law. It is, in short, a scarier way to do faith.

“Without the work of the Spirit, there is no faith,” Cotton said.

(Cotton quotes come from American Jezebel: The Uncommon Life of Anne Hutchinson, by Eve LaPlante.)