Thursday 15 April 2010

Jonas Kaufmann And Bryn Terfel Turn Met's Much-booed 'Tosca' Into A Feast Of Great Singing

update 20/04: Interview Magazine:

"Revenge of the Booed Opera
By Alex Gartenfeld 04/20/2010 03:20 PM

There is no redemption in the Napoleonic era in which Puccini's Tosca is set. None of the main characters, with the significant exception of the villainous tyrant Scarpia, could be said to have earned his or her murder by deceit or suicide. This is not the experience of the Greek hero and his insurmountable fatal flaw; the eponymous protagonist, a singer, indulges in a bit of hysterical jealousy when she realizes that her lover, the painter Cavaradossi, has painted the Madonna after the sister of an escaped rebel. Cavarodossi, for his part, plays the martyr, and the easy token victim to conservative repression of Scarpia's repressive regime.

But there was redemption Wednesday and Friday night in director Luc Bondy's production of Tosca, a piece that was booed when it premiered almost a year ago. The show was roundly compared it to the storied production by Italian director Franco Zeffirelli, with Maria Callas in the lead part. (Zeffrielli, for his part, called Bondy a "third-rate" director for turning Puccini's opera into a darker, more minimal affair).

On Wednesday, Bondy set out with a new cast: Patricia Racette, in the role opera buffs (and all they do is polish) remember as belonging to Maria Callas. Racette is irascible and inexplicable with jealousy, and then melodramatically appeased in the first act. She's tragic in the last, as her attempts to defend her lover's honor, her honor, and then his life, are in vain. Although the script calls for vast changes in temperament, Racette's style never feels episodic. She carries the lyrical arias in the second act, and her voice grows as the show goes on, pleading for Cavaradossi's release as he refuses to give up the location of the hidden rebel. Racette's a wise choice to supplement the public memory of Tosca because, like Callas, who could go dramatically flat, her's is an idiosyncratic voice. She's gravelly and her pacing is wild in the beginning, but unfolds and ultimately demonstrates control.

Jonas Kaufmann is rare for a German tenor–he’s smolderingly handsome. He's also remarkably fluid as the strong-willed bohemian who sticks to his guns but can't save himself–and maybe, just maybe will find vindication when Napoleon defeats Scarpia. His voice soaring over the orchestra in the first act was particularly remarkable. Bryn Terfel finds humor as the relentless Scarpia; he uses his strong baritone to overpower and seduce.

There are repeated complaints about the interpretation of staging, which are not, in fact, distracting. Cavaradossi's painting of the Madeleine with her breast exposed is onstage throughout; it's a sordid altarpiece in an opera with equally sordid motives. The booed production involved characters embracing this image; she's only cut, here, across the eyes by Tosa, her innocence already lost. Thankfully, the production lacked the rising and falling sets and mysterious nooks that the Met so often favors. The second act, set in Scarpia's chambers, the setting of the second act, was a wonderfully bizarre period room, which looked like an administrative post office designed by Frank Stella in the 1970s. It was as fully and obscurely realized, as an opera about unexplained wrath ought to be."

and there are more comments and reflections on Tosca here :-)
Update 16/04: NY Post review here.:

"A t'weaked 'Tosca' really sings
April 16, 2010 James Jorden
Oh, what a difference the details make -- and the right cast and conductor. This season's biggest bomb, Luc Bondy's production of "Tosca," has blossomed into one of the strongest stagings of this opera in decades.
Since the fall premiere, dozens of details have been tweaked in the critically lambasted staging of Puccini's thriller about a glamorous diva. Lights are brighter; the elegantly gowned Tosca no longer plops down on a filthy church floor -- and police chief Scarpia's Act 2 hooker four-way stops short of oral action.
An even happier improvement is the cast, especially Jonas Kaufmann as Tosca's lover, the artist Cavaradossi. His tenor is dark, even rough in places, but high notes are huge and meaty. In the love song "Recondita armonia," he faded the last note to a whisper, winning loud bravos.


Cory Weaver/Metropolitan Opera
Jonas Kaufmann's a welcome addition to the opera, in which Patricia Racette plays Tosca.
As the lustful Scarpia, Bryn Terfel commanded the stage with the suave brutality of a James Bond villain, openly mocking Tosca after her prayer "Vissi d'arte." The sinewy tone of his rich bass-baritone made the atmosphere even eerier.
Beside these two giants, Patricia Racette's Tosca seemed almost miniature. Her shimmering, true soprano easily projected over the heavy orchestration, but she underplayed the extravagance of her diva character.
Of all the night's marvels, the greatest was conductor Fabio Luisi, subbing on 10 days' notice when Met music director James Levine was sidelined by back surgery.
Shaving minutes off each act with quicksilver tempos and razor-precise transitions, he discovered haunting orchestral colors reminiscent of Debussy. He's alert to the singers, too, delicately following Kaufmann's dreamy opening of "E lucevan le stelle."
Luisi's reportedly on the short list of conductors to succeed Levine when the injury-plagued maestro chooses -- or is persuaded -- to step down. It's hard to imagine a more brilliant candidate."

Update: NY Times review here:

"Boos Become Bravos at the Met By ANTHONY TOMMASINI
Published: April 15, 2010 What a difference a cast can make.
Luc Bondy’s new production of Puccini’s “Tosca,” which opened the Metropolitan Opera’s season in September, returned on Wednesday night. Yes, that production, the one with the convoluted staging that elicited vociferous boos for the creative team when it was introduced; where the lecherous Scarpia straddles a statue of the Blessed Virgin and consorts with tawdry prostitutes; where, after stabbing Scarpia, Tosca muses on a couch in his rooms at the palazzo instead of enacting the ritual of expiation with the candles and the crucifix that Puccini devised.

Yet Wednesday’s “Tosca” was one of the most exciting performances of the Met season to date, thanks to three exceptional singers, all performing their roles for the first time at the Met. Patricia Racette, an inexplicably underrated soprano, brought a richly expressive voice and raw emotion to her wrenching portrayal of Tosca. Jonas Kaufmann, currently the hottest tenor in opera, was an impetuous and vocally smoldering Mario Cavaradossi, singing with vulnerable tenderness one moment and burnished power the next. And the bass-baritone Bryn Terfel commandeered the stage with his vocally chilling and shockingly lusty Scarpia.

The conductor Fabio Luisi, replacing James Levine, who has ongoing back problems, drew a taut, surging performance from the orchestra, chorus and cast — a wonder, since in the typical ways of repertory opera houses this “Tosca” was thrown together at the last minute. Wednesday night was the first time Mr. Luisi, the orchestra and all three of his principals were together. After Mr. Luisi agreed to cover for Mr. Levine, he flew into New York for one day last week to work with the cast in a rehearsal studio. Mr. Kaufmann, nursing a bad cold, was absent that day.

Despite the lack of rehearsal this “Tosca” was riveting. Mr. Kaufmann, Ms. Racette and Mr. Terfel are gifted, compelling and intuitive actors. Their interplay — the romantic banter between Tosca and Cavaradossi, the dangerous dance of wits between Scarpia and Tosca — was so nuanced you would have thought the singers had been rehearsing for weeks.

Karita Mattila, who sang Tosca when the production was introduced, was to have returned, but she withdrew because of illness. Tosca is a recent addition to Ms. Racette’s repertory.

She does not have a glamorous voice. Her sound can have a grainy texture, and her sustained tones can be tremulous. Still, this role suits her beautifully. She sang with uncommon richness, expressivity and honesty. In the soaring phrases of “Vissi d’arte” she captured both the dignity and despair of the character: a great diva, yet a devout woman and fiercely jealous lover.

Mr. Kaufmann received frenzied bravos from the audience. His russet-colored voice has body and charisma. You could sense amazement throughout the house at his thrilling top notes during Cavaradossi’s defiant cries of “Vittoria!” Yet his plaintive pianissimo phrases were equally impressive. That the youthful, curly-haired Mr. Kaufmann is also heartthrob-handsome did not hurt.

Mr. Bondy’s production still seems drab, confused and full of gratuitous strokes geared to rattle “Tosca” devotees. But with Mr. Bondy not on the scene this cast made some crucial alterations. During the “Te Deum” Mr. Terfel’s Scarpia exuded lust and power as he fantasized about conquering Tosca. But he stopped short of the bump-and-grind routine with the Madonna. Even the idea of surrounding Scarpia briefly with three prostitutes in his chambers made somewhat more sense with this Scarpia, since the towering, robust Mr. Terfel so easily conveys bawdy physicality.

There are still no candles and crucifix. But Ms. Racette was better than Ms. Mattila at executing Mr. Bondy’s idea that for a few minutes Tosca, with Scarpia’s body nearby, is too stunned to do anything other than ponder her choices.

The individual performances were so strong I hardly noticed the elements of the production that prompted so much earlier controversy. There are seven more performances of “Tosca” this season but only three more chances to catch this outstanding cast."

Earlier : more opinions from viewers here

or so say CBS News quoting Associated Press:

"MIKE SILVERMAN (AP) – NEW YORK — The boos heard 'round the world on opening night were mostly gone as "Tosca" reappeared at the Metropolitan Opera with a new cast that turned Puccini's melodrama into a feast of great singing.

Credit for that goes chiefly to German tenor Jonas Kaufmann as the idealistic painter Mario Cavaradossi, and Welsh bass-baritone Bryn Terfel as the evil police chief, Baron Scarpia.Both were making their first appearances at the Met in more than two years on Wednesday night, and both have been sorely missed.
Kaufmann has blossomed from a fine lyric tenor into something more. With his dark-hued voice and formidable technique he now apparently can sing Wagner, Verdi, Puccini and French opera with equal flair.As Cavaradossi, he displayed the heroic top notes required to turn his defiant cry of "Vittoria!" in Act 2 and his Act 3 aria, "E lucevan le stelle" ("And the stars were shining") into show-stoppers. Equally impressive was the ravishing tenderness he brought to many soft phrases, such as "O dolci mani" ("O sweet hands"), when he sings in wonderment that his beloved Tosca has stabbed Scarpia to death.

That murder takes place at the end of Act 2, and until his demise, Terfel etched a portrayal of tremendous power. The sheer amplitude of his sound has always been thrilling, riding easily over the orchestra during moments like the Act 1 "Te deum," where most bass-baritones struggle to be heard.But Terfel has so much more to offer. He can turn the merest whisper into a bloodcurdling threat, or casually create chills as when he invites Tosca to enjoy a sip of Spanish wine to calm her nerves before he plans to rape her.
If the title character herself has been left for last, it's not any fault of American soprano Patricia Racette. She delivered a fine, forthright performance, more down-to-earth and less the prima donna than many Toscas. Aside from a rushed high note and some pitch problems at the end of her aria, "Vissi d'arte" ("I lived for art"), she sang the part extremely well.

Still, her overall impact paled a bit next to the high-powered performances of the men.

The production by French director Luc Bondy has been modified since it opened the season to the loudest booing in Met memory — a reception that created headlines worldwide. Scarpia no longer lasciviously embraces the statue of the Madonna at the end of Act 1. Tosca no longer fans herself while casually reclining on a sofa after murdering Scarpia.A technical glitch made it appear another effect had been dropped. At the very end, Tosca is supposed to leap to her death off the prison battlements where her lover has just been executed. Bondy has a body double jump from a parapet and hang by wires over the stage. But the lights went out too soon, and she jumped in darkness.

There were still a few boos at the final curtain, but cheers for the singers drowned them out. The cheers were also loud for conductor Fabio Luisi, who led a sweeping, tense account of a score that can sound merely melodramatic."

Copyright (AP Photos/Cory Weaver - Metropolitan Opera)© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

PS i only wish i could have seen the confrontations between Mario and Scarpia in the 2nd act ;-))) Oh well, and heard them sing... sighhhh...

There will be a Met broadcast of the 24th April performances, details on the Met page here.

19 comments:

  1. Where is Cavaradossi's beard?

    ReplyDelete
  2. if you look closer the usual 2 day stubble is still there ;-) Thank God no moustache got passed over by dear Marcelo :-p

    ReplyDelete
  3. Can't agree with all of that H and must say the production is even worse than reported (this from no Zeferelli devotee who wanted something new but this is yucky). But yes JK did deliver and was received with wild enthusiasm. Bryn was good but did not really reach his vocal peak until the last 10 minutes. More later.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks marcillac :-) It was the only report i had found so far , but obviously from a distance it is frustrating not to have one's own opinion because of not being there live...
    From photos and videos sets look boring to me, not bad just nothing special and the production in itself is just traditional, nothing really new. The cuts that they seem to have made for Scarpia in order to not offend the public sensibilities seem ridiculous. Why not let Scarpia be a really bad guy? On the other hand there are more creative ways to shade the character... But all this is speculation as i have seen nothing myself. In any case the production doesn't strike me as original in any way. I don't understand what all the fuss is about, other than that it is a boring production...

    Bryn can sometimes be slower to ignite, but he still is one of my preferred Scarpias :-) With the recent changes things will probably smooth out more in the following performances. I would expect the interaction between Mario and Scarpia to be interesting in this case. I'll be curious to know more of your impressions :-) (As well as others who have been if they would like to share.) I am curious to read more details about the singing though, arias, bits, shades etc

    Musically i am looking forward to the broadcast.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bryn was a great Scarpia and sang well throughout. It's just about his best role that I've seen him in so far, possibly even better than his Figaro. For most of the evening he did not sing as well as he often has in the past (including specifically that last Figaro in 2007) and this was certainly a concern the more so with the Wagner coming up next year. The tone was somewhat rough, lacking some authority at the bottom. Still very good but again, one hopes for more. In the last scene with Tosca the "more" was there in full measure - rich smooth, superb throughout the range. He does have the goods. The bigger concern is whether he'll have the endurance to deliver at the end of Walkure. We shall see. (We were really surprised to read in his bio that this is the only opera he's doing this year - wander why that is).

    JK, obviously, had less time to warmup for Recondita but luckily was on superb form from the beginning. He certainly had no trouble filling the house and the acclaim was instantaneous and wildly enthusiastic. Still, as excellent as the acoustics at the Met are (and we sat in a part of the theater with particularly good sound - with great balance between the orchestra and voices) and as terrific as Lousi's co-ordination with the singers was perfect (really astounding given the paucity of rehearsals) - but there was just that greater ease in Zurich last year the ability to modulate sound which is just not quite as easy at the Met. Again, no sign of strain, not all purpose loudness, but...

    Speaking of the Zurich Tosca...Pat Racette is a fine singer although I'm afraid the Times review is a little bit more accurate than the Post. (not sure about the "uncommon richness" but she certainly did not have the stature either vocally or physically to compete with the other protagonists. Which is why I mention Zurich where Emily delivered the best Tosca I've encountered. She fills the role more effectively both physically and vocally even in consideration of the much more amenable setting. Its a pet peeve of mine but her absence from the Met stage up to now is something of an outrage. This would have been a good opportunity to give her a chance. (Obviously it would have been great to have Mattila as well - one assumes she's growing into the role and I do hope you have a chance to catch her in Munich).

    I mention Zurich also because of the production. Supposedly there have been all kinds of adjustments - friends of ours saw it in the fall and are going again tomorrow and will report - but while I think you're take on the production is quite accurate what you one really can't grasp without actually having seen it are the ugly sets and acres of empty space which really do make for many very unappealing images. The Zurich production might not have been very original in its overriding concept, might have been somewhat contrived, but it was, I think - hope there's a DVD - visually stylish and much better in the personalregie - even with the improved tweaks. I was perfectly ready to move on from the Zeferelli - there shouts of Long Live Z... in the crowd) but one is reluctant to embrace purposeless ugliness. I really can't believe we'll be stuck with this thing.

    Amazingly - again in consideration of the very limited rehearsal time - this was Louisi's best work at the Met this year and he was excellent in everything he did in the fall.

    ReplyDelete
  6. @marcillac

    I alwasy say at 40+ performances seen i am beyond bored with Tosca and yet, i still get excited about it sometimes :-)

    Bryn - what only opera??? You mean you really don't know about Meistersinger??? I mean this Meistersinger: http://www.wmc.org.uk/index.cfm?alias=DieMeistersinger

    I know he is being discrete about it, but i didn't think it was that secret. And i know because .. I am going!!! I have a ticket!! And am beyond excited :-) The day before i will see the premiere of Rigoletto in Cardiff.. with Simon Keenlyside :-) Now that is what i call an interesting weekend :-)

    Back to Tosca : I still think he is a bit slow to kick off in Scarpia. I know what you mean about the Wagner, i am also crossing fingers and toes for him. I absolutely loved him in der fliegende Hollander. It was the first time i heard him live and it was impressive. Then last year i went to see yet another Tosca just to hear him... and i was a bit dissapointed. Not with the interpretation, but the sound of the voice itself. But i have heard him again since and he soundes gorgeous! I don't know, maybe Scarpia is not one of his very best. However at the Met he sounded better than at the ROh ai am told. What i find so fascinatign about him is not power, although he can bring that as well, but the smoothness of the voice, the warmth and the beautiful lines. I am not a big fa of aria concerts but you should have heard his Bad Boys concert!! unbelievable! He made every single character stand out and come alive and his voice sounded different for each and ever one of them. Not many singers have this versatility. And he can create those with just his voice i find, it is incredibly expressive.He is also a good actor and besides JK, the one singer who's diction i admire most. SK is good, but not as good as Terfel. I heard in his Scarpia bits of text which were never as clear to me before and that is something!

    So i think the time he is taking now is precisely to gear up for more Wagner, he takes Hans Sachs very seriously :-) And i am preparing to enjoy my first evening of 6 hours at an opera! :-)
    More on Tosca next

    ReplyDelete
  7. Tosca productions -
    It really must be one of the pretty difficult operas to stage. In traditional stagings it is very hard to bring something new i find, they mostly just shift the painting and the doors from one side to another ;-) Or it either looks like cardboard or is overstuffed.. In this respect the Met and the ROh both suffer from the same problem. At the ROH we had the Callas production (which i think they have now sold off to a US opera house :-))) and nobody likes the new one. Not because it is particularly ugly, but it doesn't feel new. It is just as traditional and recognisable. I don't know if you had a chance to see it. it was also accused of being way too dark, the first scene is sort of underground or on a lower level, entrance being above and two big staircases dominate the scene. The second if a darkish library, one wall being a fake bookshelf with the torture room behind. The last one is indeed at the top of a tower, a big wing dominates the skies which slowly illuminate in day break. I find it gets better through the acts and the last one I like very much, the lighting is wonderful.

    The Met one is dull to look at that is true, even more so than the on at the ROH. I understand what you say about those sets, they are ugly, bad colour and just plain. And am I correct in saying that the last act plays in exactly the same dark surroundings with high dark brick walls like the 1? That to me makes no sence, because at least Mario and Floria are in two very different situations and stages in their life, and irrespective of where it takes place, the change in circumstances should be reflected in what you see on stage! Especially in the last one I find the shift from hope to despair, from life to death so important, how can it be the same as during the careless and happy exchange in the 1act ? And to me the 2nd act is all about power. After all Tosca herself has power over Scarpia through attraction and the play of power should again be reflected I believe.

    That is why I liked Carsen’s Tosca so much. It was so fresh! No more church, palazzo, tower, but still the same story and the same feelings. I wasn’t too keen on the excessive number of chairs in the first act, which hindered movement a bit too much. But overall it was exiting and told the story very well and what you saw fitted music and the emotions very well.

    ReplyDelete
  8. And I agree with you about Magee! She was wonderful and it is a pity she doesn’t sing at the ROH either :-( She may not be as strong vocally as other Toscas I have heard , but she was definitely the most touching one! Probably the first I could feel a connection to and who was more than a diva or a singer. For the first time Floria was a real women, with a personality that was interesting. Carsen definitely knows personenregie and he was also lucky in the singers he worked with. I was glued to it from the first to the last minute. And the good news is there will definitely be a DVD!! Hopefully it will not take very long for it to be published, I want to own a copy :-)

    So this was a Tosca production I really liked and I could imagine myself seeing it quite a few times.

    The problem with the Met and ROH is they need a Tosca that can be seen for more than 10, 15 years… and that is not easy to produce. I don’t know if a more modern production can last that long… any production I think becomes boring after so many years. I am not sure that just because it is a popular opera one can get away with not changing productions more often. Because I have seen it so many times I am likely to get bored with it quicker. I know I was thirsty for something new before I saw Carsen’s! Too many Madonna paintings, fancy divans and tables for Scarpia and prisons in the last act, after 20 years they all look alike.

    Mind you not all modern productions are any good… the Bregenz one got inflicted upon me over Xmas on TV… looked like a B movie kitsch that I don’t care to ever see again! I think I’d rather take the dark-back-alley with brick walls from the Met before that ;-))))

    Speaking of interesting ones, have you seen this (it is the Te deum with Terfel :-)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMGX19eBf7E
    and there is another bit
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjZxpKSL9KE&feature=related
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UijJKHKjXeo&NR=1


    It was a Nederlandse Opera production by Nikolaus Lehnhoff from 1998 i think. I find it interesting :-) I might try and get the DVD to see the whole thing properly.
    They somehow manage to produce interesting productions there; they are modern but they manage to stay away from things that are too alienating. Baring in mind that things which we might call interesting here may be seen as eurotrash at the Met ;-)))))

    Over here we are inventing a new genre of opera productions : the “doesn’t bother me” production. Meaning it is not the kind of regie where you look at the stage and think: what the f****??? Or what opera is this supposed to be again? And they are also not of the kind where you can’t see the people on stage because of the “stuff” that sits, hangs everywhere ;-))) Enough of both kinds and one develops a new appreciation for the boring, bare stage where one can focus on the music and the singers :-)

    ReplyDelete
  9. One more thing about productions…
    I am not defending Bondy’s production, and it being in the “doesn’t bother me” category is not a good thing. I have seen one Bondy production before, the Don Carlos from Paris 1996 on TV and I have the DVD. It is my favourite French Don Carlos! And I like the production even more than I liked the one at ROH, I have nothing to criticise about it and I have seen the DVD countless times. Some things I actually found amazingly similar in the two productions ;-) But the Bondy one is more stylish, more abstract and aesthetically very pleasing. Most scenes are like looking at a beautiful painting. It was I found a harmonious balance between old and new.

    So I am very disappointed that his Tosca at the Met is so uninspired…:-(

    On to the singing and music ..

    I hear Racette is a solid, good singer and I am looking forward to hear her as Butterfly at the ROH next year :-) She may not yet have all the colours for Tosca, but it I only her second Tosca after all, and one at the Met, so the pressure must be big. Reliable singing is something to be grateful for in Tosca. More than one soprano has made me suffer through this opera, and Floria has neither my favourite music in the opera nor doe I warm for her easily as sopranos traditionally tend to use it to display themselves and their voices, in a sort of double diva act… That on top of singing the single most boring aria in Puccini, Visi d’arte… yyawwwwnnnn! Well, Callas wasn’t boring ;-)))) But coming back to Emily Magee that is why I looooove her Tosca! That is why I am drawn to her interpretation, because she displays the story of Floria Tosca, not herself as a singer and very very few others manage that.

    I am not sure that Matilla sings the role better than Racette… I’ll tell you after I have had a chance to hear them both on radio or tv, since the live event I will have to wait much longer for…I looove Mattila (remember that French Don Carlo? :-) and her Salome is fascinating, but Tosca has maybe come a bit too late…

    On Louisi I’ll know more after I have heard the broadcast last week. I am sure he can deliver a very good Tosca :-) But I’ll be honest, there is only one man who has me at the edge of my seat in Tosca and who has been able to show me how truly beautiful this score is… and his name is Antonio Pappano :-) No Tosca I ever heard came close to his.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I am glad JK made a “splash” at the Met and I am even happier that from the various reports I have read he has kept all the personal touches on the role in spite of the size of the house. I wish I had been there to have an idea of the house acoustics, etc But no matter how good the acoustics are, size matters. Human beings were not meant to sing unamplified in a 4,000 seat house. And what that does to their instrument, their ways of singing as well as the ears of the public is not negligible…
    I still wonder how Florez for example sings there, he projects amazingly well, but he does take some time to breath himself up to reach up and above at the ROH, so what must it cost to do the same at the Met?
    I know all too well who the last “famous” Cavaradossi there has been or what the people are used to hearing from tenors there and I have to say dear Corelli and a few others have spoiled the way singing is done there I fear irreversibly. I will always like Corelli myself and to this day his Trovatore is still the one I grab when I feel like listing to one… BUT size of voice shouldn’t matter so much, nor should powering through a score. Some are born with it and good for them, some can surely improve with technique and some will never have the power. Are they less of a singer?? I my own personal opinion by no means. Power is only a question of decibels and while I can appreciate the sheer force of some notes it is not nor will it ever be why I go to the opera for. I don’t really care if a high note is held for 2, 5 or 10 seconds. And I have come to kind of resent the fact that it is what the public expect and the main or only thing they respect about a singer. Not in all places thank God.
    Take Tosca for example, Mr Giordani sang Mario last year at the ROH and he is a good singer with a solid performance. But belting it out didn’t get him anywhere sadly… it was the first time I have been to a Tosca where there was no applause after Recondita. And he sang well. But the public just didn’t warm up to the belting. He then took it down a notch and finally delivered a refined and elegant recount of Lucevan which finally earned him well deserved applause. But I feel he was a good example of what has come to be expected at the Met or something that has been overappreciated for a while now. The whole notion of Met-singers defines sigers who can sing loud…

    I feel for the public there, it is unfortunate that your house is so big, and surely everyone would have been better off with it having 1000 seats less… But I don’t like the kind of pressure this puts on the singers. Of course everyone will want to deliver what the public wants and sometimes this will mean more effort than they should do or will inevitably take some focus off other details. I am not saying it has changed the way JK sings his role. From what I have read it sounds like he delivered the power that the public wanted in all the right places and also managed to incorporate all the beautiful tender touches he has gradually created for his Mario, like the soft ending to Recondita, like the infinitely sweet Quale occhio al mondo or O dolci mani, etc. For me it is these latter touches that make his Mario unique (well at least for me) and so enjoyable, not the fact that he can outsing Corelli in Vittoriaaaaa! :-)
    But while he can do it in Mario, maybe others can’t and I just think the drive and thirst for power does not give the right message about opera singing and what is beautiful about it. There is so much more out there in the scores than just nigh notes and I think there needs to be some shift away from this obsession with power and high notes and more exploration of the all the rest :-) Maybe it is happening, I have heard a number of singers who I have enjoyed a lot and who do much more than just power through and the fact that today singers don’t sound like the ones from “before” is not necessarily a bad thing :-)

    ReplyDelete
  11. @marcillac, just small note, i had a listen and a think and agree about the comparison with Zurich and what you mean... I think what you said describes it very well.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Bondy Don Carlo: Agree absolutely.


    Bryn: I do recall reading about the Meistersinger but I had forgotten and the Met program - usually pretty accurate - only mentioned the Met Toscas. It had occurred to me that he was getting ready for the Wotan's and this makes even more sense in light of the Sachs. I'm sure he's doing some concerts and the most important thing is that he delivers in the Wagner. Enjoy the Meist and Rig. (I'd always wanted to go to Wales - all those fun castles - and obviously it'd be great to work in some opera.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Emily (Racette/Mattila): Our friends who saw it last fall and last night say that there have indeed been a lot of details that have been cleaned up that Racette was indeed both more dramatically comfortable and convincing and somewhat more steady vocally than Mattila. The latter could certainly have been compromised by the production or going through a bad patch, but I didn't think Racette was all that great and remain curious about Mattila in the role. (Do see the Butterfly, Racette is my favorite in this role, and among other parts has been a superb Ellen Ortford and a surprisingly good Elizabetta in DC - plus the ROH seen sux so you have to see such good bits as are available.

    Still, I would prefer Emily my favorite Tosca for the reasons you suggest - but I also think she has the voice to sing at the Met (and, even more so, at ROH). Admittedly, the regrettably few times I'v heard her have mostly been in the best acoustical circumstances (two performances at Bayreuth and Zurich), but on all those occasions I found her voice to more than adequately sized - more on that later - and specifically somewhat larger than that of another singer (heard within the week as Emily at Bayreuth and several months earlier at Zurich) who did sing at the Met with great success (and who also needs to return soon and frequently) and sufficient amplitude.

    ReplyDelete
  14. JK (Volume): There was again, no gratuitously loud singing, no lack of power, the nuances you mention and others and it would never have occurred to me to be less than entirely satisfied had I not hear the performance in Zurich. It does make me wonder about the Sigmunds next year. I hope he does it and has a great success but also that he's careful going forward.


    Generally the important thing about power is not the ability to generate generic decibels and sustain hight notes indefinitely but to be able to sing effortlessly, within one's self and have the room to give meaning to the words and shape the vocal line. I think I've mentioned how impressed I was with Stemme earlier this year and it was this aspect of her singing - at least in Ariadne - which impressed me almost as much as the richness and color of the lower two thirds of her voice.

    Unfortunately, good acoustics or not, very few singers in very few roles can do that at the Met. Bryn was effortlessly powerful and able to offer just this kind of nuance in his Met Don G yet the greater ease 15 months later at the ROH was unmistakable (I didn't particularly like his interpretations her but they were certainly well considered and presented). Pape has never shown the slightest strain at the Met and yet, heard within a few weeks of Met appearances in Vienna and Munich the greater ease was palpable. Same with Meier in closely space appearances in Fidelio and others.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Productions: Agree entirely with your analysis of why its so hard to produce Tosca. Still, one can't help to note any number of cliches and routine in Regietheater. Have the producer explain his pretentious, pseudo-intellectual view of the opera, place a bunch of chairs on the stage in such a way as to make it particularly difficult for the singers to move and the audience to see, dress the heroine in a brightly colored smock(s) to make her stand out from the bland sets and earthtoned/black/white/gray clad other characters, serve, repeat. The devil (and maybe angel), however, is, always in the details and while the Zurich Tosca worked another similarly constructed production I saw in Europe last month most emphatically did not.

    I dunno - the "doesn't bother me" standard is not at all to be despised. Unfortunately even the cleaned up new Tosca bothers me some though actually quite a bit less than the horrid Wilson Lohengrin.

    Your point about the value of a bare stage, however, is very well taken. In the even your silly enough to still be reading this, I must now, in this context return to something especially close to my heart, Figaro. The current and previous Met productions (both traditional) , while a bit clutzy (particularly the former) easily fall within the "doesn't bother me" category and allow the performance to stand on the work of the singers and conductor. The current Vienna production (there's a new one this year - the highlight of a generally dull season - but I'm somewhat apprehensive) is more spare somewhat more elegant and not only doesn't detract but enhances the performance. I saw a Vienna Festival Figaro in an old Strehler La Scala staging that was similar in kind but even more appealing (the better for being seen at the perfect-for-Mozart Theatre an der Wien). And yet, my favorite Figaro production is the one in Munich - he finally gets to the point. A bare white spaced which walls of a significant portion of the stage, traditional costumes. Much less attractive than the beautiful and and even slightly cumbersome stagings and Vienna and yet more consistently more effective on focusing your attention on the singers, the beauty and elegance of Mozart's music. It may or may not be a coincidence that the level of performance in this production (which I've now seen in 6 or 7 different runs) has invariably been of an exceptionally high level and singer who were nothing short magnificent at the Met and Vienna surpassed themselves in Munich.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Sorry H, one last thing. The sets in the 1st and 3rd Acts of the Tosca are different - you know, church vs. CSA but essentially and in terms of ambiance entirely undifferentiated - empty space, ugly walls, same colors, same lighting....

    ReplyDelete
  17. Tosca # 2: Bryn in great voice throughout which made it all the more surprising that he was able to raise it to a higher level at the end - one would have though it would have been less noticiable because there would be less contrast - but no.

    JK: Same thing, particularly gleaming high notes - not blasted, not milked but effortless and effective. Again - and you can judge for yourself when you listen tomorrow H - no sign of strain at all - but from the Zurich last year I know it can be more effortless still

    Orchestral playing perhaps even more gorgeous than on the first night.

    ReplyDelete
  18. marcillac ( i guess we could go on and on here, but i better move the discussion to a more recent post soon ;-)))) I find as well that particularily in Mozart focusing on the singers with a much barer stage is great and makes people not only sing but also act, which sometimes they do forget with Mozart :-) The combination of traditional costumes with a bare stage is what i like most as well. It doesn't force me back to daily life by just showing grey suits on stage but it also doesn't distract me from the essence by overloading visually. This i am sure is something we will pick uo again by next weekend when i will FINALLYYYYY see the new McV Aida at the ROH!!!

    On the Met singing we agree, it just isn't the same as singing in other places, but good technique will go a long way of making people sing successfully at the Met as well :-)

    ReplyDelete
  19. OMG i soo have to run... yes, i am linking Luisi as well verry different from Pappano but very dramatically intense, i likey! And that orchestra is really good which makes it more enjoyable still! and Bryn is a blast!!!! I listened to the Hollander last night from the Met and although it was ok.. ish... it was nohting like Bryn's a few months ago at the ROH! Loved that one, producting, singing all.. and it was my first!!! Yesterday i kind of recognised Wagner in it, if that makes sense :-) Hollander was my first Wagner live perdiod, the on at the ROH, and now quite a few more down the road it kind of rings in a very different way!! I want to listen to the one from ROh again.. it's a beautiful music!!!
    JK.. as long as there is no Corelli ghost inside him or anywhere in sight ;-)) i'll be ok with it if you know what i mean. I like his Mario, always did (as you can read from my most recent post) and if he stays true to himself i'm sure i'll like this one as well :-) That is what i meant. I'm pretty sure he would never strain himself, probably knows his voice all too well to do anything like that after all these years :-) It's more a matter of taste of which type of Mario i like more, or to put it some other way, i think his is special enough, doesn't need to neither borrow nor sound like anyone else. And i loved Corelli's just the way he did it, it suited him ;-) Need to run! Later:-)

    ReplyDelete

This blog is moderated, comments need to be approved by author