Drug cases aren’t won at trial. If the police find a pound of marijuana or 28 grams of cocaine in your car, a jury is not likely to let you walk. The police found the drugs in your car; juries and judges convict at trial on those facts.
Drug cases are won at suppression hearings. An experienced criminal defense attorney will file a motion to suppress in every case where physical evidence is found. The judge will set a pre-trial or omnibus hearing date prior to your trial so the motion to suppress can be argued.
If you consent to the police searching your car, the odds of having the drugs suppressed move in an unfavorable direction. If you refuse consent, our chances of winning are greatly improved.
Despite what they may try to tell you, the police can’t search your car just because they’ve pulled you over for a traffic offense. In fact, unless they’ve developed reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot, they have a duty to write you a ticket or give you a warning, return your license and registration, and let you go about your business.
In Arkansas, reasonable suspicion means a suspicion based on facts or circumstances that don’t constitute the probable cause necessary to justify a lawful arrest, but which give rise to more than a bare suspicion; that is, a suspicion that is reasonable as opposed to imaginary or purely conjectural.
If the police have developed reasonable suspicion, they may hold you for up to fifteen minutes while they investigate. The facts considered in Arkansas when determining whether a reasonable suspicion exists are:
(1) The demeanor of the suspect;
(2) The gait and manner of the suspect;
(3) Any knowledge the officer may have of the suspect’s background or character;
(4) Whether the suspect is carrying anything, and what he or she is carrying;
(5) The manner in which the suspect is dressed, including bulges in clothing, when considered in light of all of the other factors;
(6) The time of the day or night the suspect is observed;
(7) Any overheard conversation of the suspect;
(8) The particular streets and areas involved,
(9) Any information received from third persons, whether they are known or unknown;
(10) Whether the suspect is consorting with others whose conduct is reasonably suspected;
(11) The suspect’s proximity to known criminal conduct;
(12) Incidence of crime in the immediate neighborhood;
(13) The suspect’s apparent effort to conceal an article; and
(14) The apparent effort of the suspect to avoid identification or confrontation by a law enforcement officer.
Where the police lack reasonable suspicion to detain you after the legitimate purpose for the traffic stop ends, they must let you leave. If they do not, they’ve unlawfully detained you. Evidence seized after legitimate purpose for the stop ended may be suppressed.
The police will almost always ask you for your consent to search your car prior to the legitimate purpose for the traffic stop ending, that is, they will ask for consent before they give you your ticket or warning. They’ll insinuate that you have to let them search, that they’ll call the k-9, that you refusing gives them grounds to search, and a long list of other tricks to get you to let them search your car.
Don’t ever give your consent. As soon as you do, most of our arguments in favor of suppressing the evidence are lost. They may call the k-9, they may get a warrant, they may search anyway, but, if they’re asking you’re permission, they probably don’t have the reasonable suspicion or probable cause needed for them to do those things. If they did, why would they ask your permission? That’s not how the police operate.
Stand your ground. Always refuse consent. They may search anyway but we have a lot more options and a much better shot at winning your case where you refuse.