It's Renewal Season at AIPLA!
AIPLA is first and foremost a membership-based organization. You can learn more about membership and how to join in our
Member Center or you can contact Member
Services at membership@aipla.org or 703.412.4341. We are here to help!
See our newest members here: aipla.org/members.
Visit AIPLAConnect to interact with your AIPLA communities. Don't forget to login for full access!
Upcoming Events Upcoming Events
-
2024 Trademark Boot Camp (TMBC)
June 24 to 27, 2024
The Fourteenth Annual Trademark Boot Camp is a comprehensive online CLE program designed for new practitioners and others interested in learning the basics of trademark practice. Topics include; trademark clearance, pre-filing considerations, trademark prosecution, international trademark filing strategies, disputes, including trademark investigations, cease-and-desist campaigns, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) practice, and an introduction to trademark litigation.
Upcoming WebinarsUpcoming Webinars
-
AIPLA CLE Webinar: USPTO AI Guidelines
June 20, 2024 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM | Up to 90 CLE Minutes
Join us as our speakers discuss the recently issued USPTO examination guidance regarding patentability for artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted inventions. The guidance states that AI-assisted inventions are not “category unpatentable.” Instead, when a natural person provides a “significant contribution” to an invention, such an invention can be patentable even if an AI system contributed to the invention. While the guidance does not constitute law, it is grounded in law, i.e., the Federal Circuit’s so-called Pannu factors, which serve as a test for ensuring that a natural person contributed, at least in part, to the conception of the invention as required in the Federal Circuit’s Thaler decision on AI inventorship. The guidance also provides several useful guidelines and examples to help patent practitioners determine what constitutes a “significant contribution” for purposes of establishing natural person inventorship and, thus, patentability for AI-assisted inventions.
Latest IP News More Updates
-
AIPLA Comments to USPTO on Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees
June 5, 2024
Arlington, VA. June 3, 2024 - The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the USPTO in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees During Fiscal Year 2025. -
AIPLA Comments to USPTO on Trademark Fee Proposal
June 3, 2024
Arlington, VA. May 28, 2024 - The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the USPTO in in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the Setting and Adjusting Trademark Fees During Fiscal Year 2025. -
AIPLA Comments to USPTO on Expanding Opportunities to Appear Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
May 24, 2024
Arlington, VA. May 21, 2024 - The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the USPTO in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Expanding Opportunities to Appear Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).
AIPLA Direct More Updates
-
Supreme Court Affirms Eleventh Circuit’s Ruling in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Sherman Nealy
May 9, 2024
On May 9, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Warner Chappell Music, Inc., et al. v. Sherman Nealy, et al., affirming the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling that, provided suit is timely filed under the discovery rule, copyright damages are recoverable for infringements occurring prior to the Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations. The majority opinion is consistent with the amicus brief filed by AIPLA on December 1, 2023. To read the opinion of the Court, please click here. -
Supreme Court Vacates and Remands 10th Circuit's Decision in Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc.
June 29, 2023
On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded the 10th Circuit's decision in Abitron v. Hetronic. The Court held that the Lanham Act’s causes of action for trademark infringement do not rebut a canon of statutory construction—the presumption against extraterritoriality. Accordingly, any triggering conduct for Lanham Act liability must be domestic, and the Court held that the relevant triggering conduct is “infringing ‘use in commerce.’” The decision is in part inconsistent with the amicus brief filed by AIPLA on December 26, 2022. To read the opinion of the Court, please click here. -
Supreme Court Rules Andy Warhol Foundation Violates Copyright in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith
June 15, 2023
On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court ruled that the Andy Warhol Foundation (AWF) violated Lynn Goldsmith’s copyright. As advocated in AIPLA’s Amicus Brief filed on June 17, 2022, the Court confirmed that a fair use analysis involves weighing all the statutory factors, and that a fair use analysis is an objective inquiry. To read the opinion of the Court, please click here.
IP Marketplace
List in IP MarketplaceMedia Kit
View the 2024 Media KitStrategic Plan
View the Strategic Plan- My Profile
- Find a Committee
- Webinars
- AIPLA List of Arbitrators & Mediators
- Find a Publication
- Global IP